Dear Comrades,
 
Everything depends on moods and tastes?
We have no alternative
General Secretary’s 
Desk
This is a work 
paper relating to proposed 
Indefinite strike 
from 17.1.2012
Dear 
Comrade,
HAPPY NEW 
YEAR TO ALL OF YOU AND YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS
Not often - 
but inevitable
The JCA has 
issued a Clarian call for indefinite strike from 17.1.2012 demanding to stop the 
implementation of Mail Network Optimization Project and settlement of assured 
charter of demands placed during July 2011 strike. You may think why this call 
has been given again within a short span of six months. This may perhaps, be due 
to the sufferings you are experiencing at field levels in organizingthe members 
for strikes very often. 
Abundant 
confidence
The Postal 
JCA deferred the indefinite strike in July 2011 with the hope that the 
commitments given by the Secretary, Department of Posts herself and also 
recorded everything in the minutes will be honoured in true spirit. But what 
happened? Except few, many major items are under still cold storage. In the 
meantime, the Department declared that it is going to implement the L1 & L2 
proposals in toto unilaterally in the staff side meeting. What is option 
available then for the JCA except to launch struggles against this move?We are 
optimistic about our organizational strength that struggle programmes are not 
new to the Postal employees as they had the history of conducting various 
strikes including many one days in the C. G. Employees movement after 1968 and 
also having the spirit for spontaneous action, alertness, awareness and 
preparedness available in abundant for any action including local struggles 
against injustice in the grass root level leaders.
Consultancy 
or conspiracy!
Why we are 
objecting the L1 & L2 scheme? First let us clear that we are not against any 
modernization. But modernization shall not pave way to dislocate staff and cause 
impair to the service. The proposal of L1 & L2 is not fully related to 
modernization also. The Postal department, earlier appointed a foreign 
consultancy called KPMG by incurring crores of rupees as consultancy charges and 
we don’t know the fate of its recommendations and 
report.
Recently, 
the Department appointed Mckinsey as consultancy service. Whether the Mckinsey 
consultancy is the lowest bidder! Not at all! It is jus 12.66 crores of rupees. 
With exorbitant charges, it was appointed as consultancy service. What is the 
need to make it as consultancy service for such exorbitant rates? No one knows 
what is behind the curtain. 
Notorious 
for privatization of Government Services
If you go 
through industry insight of Mckinsey, you can find the following: 
-
“Postal 
Express and Parcel Services”
“In 
addition to new technologies and systems, globalization, deregulation and 
privatization have been the key drivers of change in the post and express world 
over the past two decades;Numerous Postal companies have successfully navigated 
the path of privatization from state monopolies to become listed companies.We 
support our clients as they position themselves to meet regulatory requirements 
and accompany them on the road to successful 
privatization.”
Not magic 
figure/only arithmetic without survey
No 
ex-aggregation. The above are taken only from their website.The Department has 
taken Mckensey not only for offering suggestions but also of its implementation. 
The members of McKensey have behaved more than that of the Chief PMGs in many 
places resulting with sporadic struggles in AP, Karnataka &Tamilnadu 
circles. There after they were restrained. The Department first issued orders 
for closure of 9797 (magic figure) post offices in urban areas. This is not the 
figure arrived by collecting statistics on the basis of financial viability or 
work load justification. Just it was based on the mathematical calculations as 
per the suggestions of the consultancy service.
Deviating 
from social obligation
The 
Department introduced ‘Speed Post hub’ and centralized the speed post traffic. 
There was a hue and cry in case of intra circle mails. High court of Himachal 
even criticized badly on this centralization. But the officers at the helms of 
affairs stated that these intra circle mails are negligible mails and we are 
concerned only for business. Really surprising! Whether the postal service is 
deviating from the path of social service? Eventhough it was agreed to open 
intra circle speed post centers, the Chief PMG/PMGs are reluctant to implement 
the orders of the Directorate.
Whether 
Chief PMG or above DG?
The Chief 
PMG, Maharashtra Circle has constituted an internal committee for making 
recommendationson ‘how to reduce the deficit”. The committee recommended for 
immediate down gradation of 39 single handed post offices as BOs and down grade 
549 single handed offices available in rural areas as branch post offices. The 
remaining 349 offices in urban, 117 post offices shall be merged immediately 
with the nearby offices and the remaining offices will be downgraded/merged 
after exercising the establishment review.
The 
commitment
The 
Secretary, Department of Posts in the recorded minutes issued on 6.7.2011 
assured interalia: -
“Regarding 
closure/merger of post offices, the staff side requested that whenever there is 
a closure of a PO, there should be simultaneous relocation of PO in the new 
emerging areas etc. The view point of the staff side was agreed 
to.”
Is 
agreement absurd?
Then how 
can be this contradiction? Whether the Directorate instructions,as stated on 
27.12.2011, circulated during August 2011 not exhibited the same spirit of the 
minutes? If so what is the action proposed to be taken against the Chief PMG 
Maharashtra circle who proposed to close down all the 898 single handed post 
offices in his circle unilaterally as if poses himself higher than the 
Secretary?
Really no 
teeth or enactment of Drama!
The same 
Chief PMG has closed down two sorting offices resulting in 10 days strike of RMS 
employees of Maharashtra Circle during November 2011. Despite the Department 
advised him not to close down those offices, he did not care and refused to 
budge. The Directorate in the recorded minutes assured that there will be no 
victimization, FR 17 (a) etc.; whereas charge sheets, memo for issue of FR 17 
(a) and all repressive measures have been 
unleashed.
If the 
Directorate has no teeth to control such lower officers, then what is the need 
of Apex level office and discussions and agreements with unions? If no, is it 
the drama enacted to befool the unions? If the same epidemic spreads to other 
circles what will be the position? Will it not be nip in the bud 
itself?
Very firm 
to deteriorate the services!
Member 
(operation) has almost declared on 27.12.2011 in the talks that he will 
implement the L1 & L2 despite our protest and will review after some years. 
How can we allow the L1 & L2 in RMS which will hamper the efficiency of 
Postal services and lead the extinction of RMS.?
The Staff 
side raised many apprehensions about the quality of mails processing which have 
not been kept for creating L1 & L2 and also the projects lack of the 
following three parameters.
i)        
It is not beneficial to 
customers.
ii)       
Operative cost will be 
more, compared to earlier.
iii)     
Lead to dislocation of 
staff and leading to ultimate closure of L2 
offices.
The Staff 
also explained in its letter dt 07.12.2011 about the impracticability in 
introduction of L1 & L2 in many places. The proposal is nothing but to 
centralize the sorting work at one place and accumulate the staff to that place 
and later to introduce the Automatic sorting machines for sorting 
work.
AMPCs – 
nothing but white elephants
Now let us 
discuss about the AMPC functioning at Mumbai & Chennai. Both are while 
elephants and causing loss in crores to the department every year. The following 
is the version of the Chief PMG, Maharashtra circle and not of the 
JCA/us.
“At 
present, a sum of Rs. 72,84, 864 is being spent annually for maintenance and 
electricity charges of the AMPC machine. Besides this, a sum of Rs. 10892064 is 
being incurred as establishment cost. There would be a saving to the tune of Rs. 
1,81,76,928/- per annum, if AMPC unit is merged with, APSO, 
Mumbai.”
The 
Reality
When the 
department desires to introduce two more AMPCs at Delhi, Kolkata and later on at 
all L1 offices, the above is the statement of an officer about the loss incurred 
due to AMPCs. In Chennai, the AMPC is not at all functioning and it is under 
condemned conditionsand the mails received at Chennai Central/Egmore are back 
routed to AMPC (20 kms. away) just to show some statistics and bringing back to 
same Central/Egmore for transmission instead of sorting there 
itself.
Whimsical 
introductions – resulting loss
Already 
experienced AMPCs become white elephants and causing losses to the exchequer of 
the department, how can we allow introducing machines in all stations. Let them 
first prove that the machines provided earlier are worthy and purposeful. We 
should also remind how the officers in Postal are working out new schemes 
without minding the loss.
(i)            
There is no consultation 
in the board and everything based on the desirability of the individuals who are 
holding position and there are more 
sycophants.
(ii)          
The introduction of air 
freighter carrier caused loss to the tune of 300 crores. Not only that, back 
routing of mails to provide sufficient loadsled to irreparable damage to the 
department due to delay in delivery. Finally it was dropped. It is pertinent to 
mention that the same lower level officers who were responsible for the 300 
crores loss are now advocating the L1 & L2 
vigorously.
(iii)         
For Videshi MO, the soft 
purchased exceeded crores. What is the revenue?As learnt, so far, 39 MOs to the 
revenue around Rs. 4000/- which cannot be equated to the extent of 1% with the 
expenditure for launching the scheme.
(iv)        
Introduction of VSAT was 
a great failure.
(v)          
Loss incurring in BNPL 
articles due to return article & non realization of revenue 
etc.
Chootu kool 
– the tip of the ice burg
We can cite 
many business activities which resulted in financial loss. For instance, in 
Maharashtra Circle Chotukool of Godrej was marketed for higher cost than the MRP 
(MRP 3740/- but in Godrej Website it is Rs. 3250/-) and out of 7169 sold, 5654 
were sold to GDS; 857 were to Departmental employees & only 658 were sold to 
Public. Is it real marketing to deceive& cheat the lowest paid GDS Agents by 
offering loan with interest from societies? The Chotukool loads were carried 
through MMS vans for which the department has been served with notice by the 
revenue authorities. All the marketing targets lead to exploitation of 
employees. Can anyone deny this bare factor?
Compromise 
– not possible
Under these 
circumstances, where is the guarantee that the formation of L1 &L2 will 
enhance the quality of service. It will deteriorate further. The staff will be 
dislocated and the service will be hampered. The staff side could not compromise 
these aspects and that is the main reason for reviving the deferred strike with 
a short period of notice.
Determined 
negative position against GDS
Let us 
discuss the other issues we notified in the strike charter. The following are 
the assurances given in respect of the most exploited GDS 
cadres.
(i)                  
Cash handling points for 
BPM for fixation of TRCA will be reduced to 10,000/- from 20000/- within a 
week.
(ii)                
Fresh proposal will be 
sent to MOF for revision of bonus ceiling on 
GDS.
(iii)               
Protection of TRCA will 
be provided in the same stage in case of reduction of 
work.
But what 
happened? The internal finance in the Directorate has simply turned down the 
files and the assurances were gone to wind. We again discussed the same with 
Member (P) on 27.12.2011 for which she replied that she cannot give any 
assurances in these issues. Discussing the same issues again and again and 
taking different positions by the officers in each time frustrates us. 
No relief 
to bereaved family – they are GDS
The 
department has issued orders for fixing norms for compassionate appointment for 
GDS in which 25 points have been allotted for Graduation for consideration. Is 
it having any sense? Whether the wards in distress in rural areas could be 
expected to complete graduation when the minimum qualification in fixed as 
matriculation for GDS appointment. For GDS appointment under compassionate 
grounds 50% marks is compulsory; resulting in many wards could not get their 
fair chance. The earlier orders to provide job immediately after the demise of 
the GDS as a social obligation to the bereaved family by relaxing the condition 
are brushed aside and the benefits extended earlier to the family of the 
deceased poor GDS are restricted or deviated. 
Half 
century old provision for GDS freezed in toto
In respect 
of Postmen Recruitment Rules, 25% has been allotted to direct recruitment from 
open market. It was 100% over 50 years and this has been freezed due to personal 
ego of some officers who don’t want to see the plight of poor GDS possessing 
more skills & qualifications.
The 25% 
recruitment among the GDS on seniority basis has been thrown down. This was 
assured to consider by the Secretary herself during the meeting held in July 
2011. Now Member (P) on 27.12.2011 is stating that is not possible since the 
department desires to inject direct recruits from open market. Till date, we are 
saying the postmen recruitment as direct recruitment quota only and not as 
promotion to GDS. The assurances to provide norms for NREGIS work has not been 
compiled with so far.
Everything depends on moods and tastes?
From the 
above, it could be evident that all the assurances made during July 2011 in 
writing in respect of the most downtrodden GDS have taken back by subsequent 
officers. Thus anything is not certain and depends upon the mood and taste of 
the officers who are at helm of affairs at 
present.
Denial of 
dues & Deprivation to casual labourers – only in 
Postal
It was 
recorded in the minutes dt. 06.07.2011 that for the casual labourers engaged 
prior to 1993, it was agreed to settle their case for payment on prorate basis 
within one month and post 1.9.93 cases will be taken up with MOF for settlement. 
Whether it is honoured? Not at all! A committee has been constituted and now it 
is told that after the receipt of the report, it will be considered. The Staff 
side is not consulted or provided a chance to represent in such committees. It 
is only the Postal department that the prorate wages as per sixth CPC has not 
been extended to casual labourers and contingent employees. The assurances to 
appoint the contingent workers as GDS and also to provide chances for their 
absorption in GDS vacancies have not been implement so 
far.
OTA or 
pittance for extra work
In all 
other Central Government department, the OTA rates have been revised with new 
nomenclature. Railways revised the rates. Defence enhanced the rates. The 
remaining only operative section, the postal Department has not taken any 
efforts either to revise the rates or formulate new methods for compensation in 
lieu of OTA. It is most unfortunate that meager OTA ordered earlier are being 
recovered by applying the ceiling. In Haryana circle, one RMS Supdt has issued 
FR 17(A) notice for non-performance of OTA.Where are such provisions? Absurd. 
The department is not carrying out with any concrete decision to arrest such 
menace even in the meeting held on 27.12.2011.
JCM – 
Conciliation to avoid confrontation – But here confrontation seeking 
conciliation 
As per the 
JCM Schemes, meeting should be held once in three months but not later than six 
months and periodical meetings should be held separately with each union once in 
four months. But there is no meeting regularly held. Over six years, no 
periodical meeting is held. Only one departmental council meeting was held in 
August 2010. Even the assurances given in the meeting are not being implemented. 
The following are the few examples: -
(i)            
Counting of special 
allowance for pay fixation in case of PO & RMS Accountants – Despite the Law 
ministry has given opinion that it is not a fit case for filing SLP against 
Karnataka High court decisions and also our repeated requests, the Department is 
seeking the opinion of circle heads. The file is still under 
consideration.
(ii)          
Discontinuing the 
practice of obtaining fidelity/security bond from employees handling cash& 
also SPMs – Despite 5th CPC has recommended for this, the same is 
pending years together. The officials are unnecessarily paying premium to credit 
societies every year a huge amount towards premium for renewing fidelity 
band.
(iii)         
Protection of pay of 
defunct scale of PO &RMS Accountants – we are demandingthe application of 
Directorate order No. 2-2/88-PE-I dt. 1.12.1992 issued in favour of Sri. Natha 
Singh in Punjab Circle for the similarly situated persons. But no decision has 
been taken yet on this issue.
(iv)        
Arbitrary and forcible 
allotment of Quarters in Rajasthan Circle.
(v)          
Non supply of statement 
of balance to the official brought under New Pension Scheme 
2004.
(vi)        
Non grant of special 
allowance to unqualified Accountants.
(vii)       
Enhancement of financial 
powers of HSG I, HSG II & LSG 
Postmasters.
(viii)     
Recovery of alleged over 
payment of Pay & Allowances to Postman on account of fixation from the 
officials working in Accounts branch.
(ix)        
Tenure posting of 
officials in single & double handed post offices & remove the 
restriction posting of SPM due to minor penalties/CR 
entries.
(x)          
Enhancement of honorarium 
for engaging officials in departmental 
examinations.
(xi)        
Allowing to appear the 
physically handicapped officials for IPO 
exam.
(xii)       
Transfer of all HSG I 
posts to General line.
(xiii)     
Revision of cash 
Allowance to the SPMs handling cash in the absence of Treasurer & grant of 
Treasury allowances to all posts irrespective of their position after the grant 
of MACP promotions.
Most of the 
issues cited above are still in processing stage only even after the lapse of 15 
months. The delay over year causes resentment.
Is cadre 
restructuring – A mirage in Postal
The 
proposals for cadre restructuring have been discussed more than six to seven 
times but no minutes were issued so far. The position is still under the initial 
stage. The Secretary assured in the minutes that it will be formulated before 
31.8.2011. What are the reasons for such lethargy? Is it not their 
responsibility to take serious note in this staff welfare? The Sixth Pay 
Commission stated to finalise the cadre review proposal by the department 
itself, but even after the lapse of 5 years, there is no move to this direction 
in respect of our cadres.
Clear 
injustice and cheating
Member (P) 
while discussing the demands on 27.12.2011, stated that it is not possible to 
create separate cadre for system Administrators, as they are only PAs and now in 
all Post offices, the PAs are becoming the trouble shooters.We recorded our 
objections. Then Secretary praised the services of these officials at the time 
of extracting work from them. Without spending a rupee the modernization in 
postal to the present extent could be achieved due to their tireless and tedious 
work. After sucking their blood, instead of recognizing their services, they are 
now sidelined.
Committee – 
to consider or deny?
A separate 
committee consisting of three DDGs was constituted to consider the proposals. We 
don’t know what the fate of the committee is. In the last cadre review 
meeting,it was discussed and agreed for the carving outthis cadre with higher 
promotional posts. If the department now declines to consider this case, how can 
we allow?
No time! 
Very busy! Mckensey is on the door!
The Postmen 
committee headed by Ms. KalpanaTiwary General Manager, MB is still not met and 
the madam is very busy in implementing the proposals of Mckensey anyhow in 
postal despite all odds and consequences. All their problems are undressed. 
Their issues like combination of beats,double duty, harassment in project arrow 
offices, distance factor, number of articles, Grant of cycle allowance without 
distance conditions, good quality uniforms, revision of norms etc. have not been 
taken for consideration and all are under the cold 
storage.
All 
centralisation – But here decentralization!
The only 
major demand of the Administrative union to stop decentralisation of PLI and 
RPLI and save DPLI has not been taken due note of and the rapid decentralisation 
has already taken off without providing any man power or required infrastructure 
to operative staff in POs. The similar is the situation in respect of Postal 
Accounts & civil wing and their genuine grievances are not attended so 
far.
Lost 
identity – continuous denial of dues
The only 
demand of the SBCO to declare it as divisional cadre has been out rightly 
rejected by the member (P) on 27.12.2011 even though it was assured to consider 
during the July 2011 talks. The genuine demands of drivers who cannot be equated 
with staff car drivers due to their recruitment condition of requirement of 
heavy vehicle licence and shall only be equated either with railway or defence 
are not being met with justice. The same condition prevails to Artisans & 
charge hands in MMS.
20 years 
demand – Not for outright rejection
Member (P) 
out rightly rejected the demand on RTP to consider their service for MACP 
promotion on 27.12.2011, instead of taking up the cases with nodal ministries. 
Similarly the issues required clarifications on MACP are also dealt with routine 
manner instead of considering the genuine plight of the 
officials.
Importance 
of Accounts – How can it be explained!
Member (P) 
is of the opinion that there is no need for separate APM Accounts & others. 
The importance of Accounts and the role of Accountants in all dealings have to 
be explained once again. That is the fate of the 
unions.
Reminding 
black emergency days to catch ‘Aadmis’ for family planning 
The 
assurances made in July 2011 to permit the Postmaster Grade I officials to 
appear IPO/Group ‘B’ examination has not been honored yet. There is no clear cut 
decision on this even after five months. Our demand to fill up all LSG, HSG II 
of HSG I Posts before implementation of postmaster’s cadre by relaxing the 
conditions has not at all been considered.
No! No! – 
you are similarly situated Persons!
The request 
to apply the Supreme Court judgment on RRR Candidates of Tamilnadu circle to all 
the similarly situated persons has been turned down by Member (P) on 
27.12.2011.
Contributory negligence – Democle’s 
sword
We demanded 
to issue a clarificatory orders to arrest the menace of misuse of contributory 
negligence factors against innocent officials as the instruction issued in July 
2011 is totally insufficient and not covered all the following important 
points.
(i)            
Non adherence of DG’s 
order dated 09.07.1959
(ii)          
Violation of Directorate 
orders dt. 30.11.60 & 10.02.1975
(iii)         
Non observation of 
Appendix 4 of FHB vol. I.
(iv)        
Violation or Rule 204 (A) 
(1) Vol III – Honest errors can be 
condoned.
(v)          
Violation of Rule 
137-Recovery from retired officials.
(vi)        
Violation of Rule 106, 
107 & 108 Vol III – Extenuating factors should be given due 
weight.
(vii)       
Violation of Directorate 
orders dt. 8.10.63 – Minor mistakes in discharging duties to be 
condoned.
(viii)     
Violation of Dte. letter 
dated 29.11.2000 about Rule 11 (iii) of CCS 
Rules.
Misuse of 
powers! Not at lower level! By the power at Apex 
level
There is 
total misuse of Contributory negligence factors. APM (Accounts) & 
Accountants who have not obtained declaration at the time of 5th CPC 
are being ordered with recovery to the extent of 7 to 8 lakhs in each case. How 
can it be justified? The Chief PMG, MP Circle & Chief PMG Tamilnadu 
clarified about fixation of postman pay by taking two advance increments for 
each case. Whether the department will initiate action against them to recover 
the whole amount from them for issue of such clarifications in respect of their 
circle? If the department did not like to waive the over payment, it would have 
filed SLP in the Supreme court against Principle CAT orders and this is nothing 
but absolute misuse of this provisions.
Minus 
Balance – major threat
In many 
circles recoveries under contributory negligence on SB minus balance are being 
ordered without initiating any action to recover the amount first from the 
depositors. Before finalizing the minus balance, whether the unposted items have 
been cleared or not? Not at all! Just by hook or crook the responsibility is 
being fixed on anyone’s shoulder! No norms! No ethics! The suggestion of the CHQ 
to adjust them under UCP and initiate action to recover the amount from deposit 
which was discussed in the last July 2011 meeting also has not at all been 
considered!
Curbs in 
trade unions – topsy turvey actions against rules at circle 
levels
This is 
another serious development in recent days in many circles in curbing the trade 
union activities at circle level.
When Sri. 
B. BhagwanDass Member (D) clarified vide his letter No. 8-1/2001-SR dated 
7.2.2001 that FR 17 (A) can be imposed only in cases of incitement, instances of 
violence and sabotage etc.
Whereas, 
the same is flouted in many circles and the circle heads are running amuck with 
their own views.
(i)      
In Punjab circle, 
Jullendhar division, the officials availed EL/MC from 24.5.2011 to 26.5.2011 and 
also for two or three days suffix/prefix were awarded Dies non with the 
presumption that they would have been attended Dharna at Chandigarh organized by 
the Postal JCA on 25.05.2011
(Where is 
the provision?)
(ii)    For participation of strike on 7.9.2010, All 
India strike more than 500 GDS where awarded with FR 17 (A). Is it not violating 
the Directorate orders cited above? Similar is the case in Pune 
RMS.
(iii)   In Mumbai City West division, the SPMs who 
have already given their declaration about their participation of strike on 
7.9.2010 and the ASPOs replied that he could not make any arrangements were 
proceeded with Rule 16 charges. The SPOs punished them with censure. Now the DPS 
reviewed and issued notice to 28 Officials to enhance the punishment from 
censure to withholding one increment for 24 months and awarded the same to one 
official at first. The DPS charged that the official should have come to control 
room and deposit key on 7.9.2010. Is there any such provision to deposit the key 
in the rules without handing over the charge to other? How can it be violated 
the Rule? Is it not absolute misuse of disciplinary powers and excessive action? 
When the strike on 7.9.2010 was not declared as illegal, whether such 
proceedings will meet justice. When these were brought to the notice of 
Directorate,it remains as mute spectators.
Unbridled 
horses – silent spectators at
The above 
are the real facts and nothing exaggerated. Under these circumstances what will 
be the option available to unions to ventilate their grievances. Even assured 
demands are not honored and diluted what is the remedy available for us. When 
all the circle/divisional heads and PTC Directors are taking law on their hands 
to penalize the officials for no reason, how we can shut our 
eyes.
We have no alternative
The Postal 
JCA after elaborating all these issues and facts have decided to go ahead with 
the preparation for the indefinite strike from 17th January 
2012.
Therefore 
it is our fervent appeal that all our circle secretaries/divisional secretaries 
shall rise up to the occasion and organize the workers for the total 
participation of officials in the ensuring strike. 
Mobilise 
the rank & file
The P3 CHQ 
is nominating the CHQ office bearers as representatives for organising the 
workers in each Circle. 
The 
following CHQ office bearers are incharge of below mentioned circles for strike 
preparation
| 
Com. 
MangeshParab, Working President | 
Maharashtra 
Circle | 
| 
Com. N. 
Gopalakrishnan, Working President | 
Karnataka 
Circle | 
| 
Com. R. C. 
Mishra, Vice President | 
Odisha 
Circle | 
| 
Com. C. P. 
Shobhana, Vice President | 
Kerala 
Circle | 
| 
Com. R. 
Sivannarayana, Dy. General Secretary | 
Andhra 
Pradesh Circle | 
| 
Com. 
GaurangDevMaitty, Asst. General Secretary | 
West Bengal 
Circle | 
| 
Com. Subash 
Mishra, Asst. General Secretary | 
U.P & 
Uttarakhand Circle | 
| 
Com. A. 
Veeramani, Asst. General Secretary | 
Tamilnadu 
Circle | 
| 
Com. 
Balwinder Singh, Financial Secretary | 
Punjab, 
Haryana & Delhi Circle | 
| 
Com. H. P. 
Diwakar, Asst. Financial Secretary | 
Rajasthan, 
H. P. & J & K Circle | 
| 
Com. S. A. 
Hameed, Org. General Secretary | 
Chattisgarh& M. P. Circle | 
| 
Com. U. K. 
Tiwari, Org. General Secretary | 
Bihar & 
Jharkhand Circle | 
| 
Com. L. P. 
Saikia, Org. General Secretary | 
Assam & 
North East Circle | 
All Circle 
Secretaries are requested to invite them and arrange meeting at all regional 
levels positively in the second week of January2012. TA/DA of the office bearers 
may please be borne by the respective circle unions for the Strike 
tour.
All circle 
secretaries are requested to arrange meeting at all regional headquarters and 
invite the CHQ representative for such meeting. Similarly all circle secretaries 
and circle office-bearers should organize strike tour alongwith other JCA 
constitutes to make the strike a grand success.
Act, 
agitate, achieve and advance
It is our 
duty to fight for the survival and future of the Department of the post as well 
as advancing by achieving our demands.
Let us pull 
down all the differences at all levels and unite to act, advance and achieve. 
Let us organize the workers with full devotion and show our united strength with 
100% participation in the strike compelling the Government to come down and 
settle our demands.
Note: -  
This paper is being prepared in simple English just in order to reach all the 
comrades right from HSG I to GDS. All Circle/Divisional Secretaries are 
requested to translate this paper in regional language and circulate among all 
the postal employees irrespective of unions they belong. They should have the 
only intention that the struggle is for our survival & 
advancement.
With 
struggle greetings,
Comradely 
yours,
(K. V. 
Sridharan) General 
Secretary
Dated – 
30.12.2011
