Dear Comrades,
PANAJI: The Indian postal
service cannot be held liable for wrongful acts done by a foreign post
office beyond the limits of India and the Indian postal service enjoys
legal immunity from being prosecuted for wrong payments or delay in
payments for money order by foreign post offices.
This is a recent judgment of the Goa state consumer disputes redressal commission which upheld the ruling of the South Goa consumer disputes redressal forum.
The case relates to a complaint filed by Suresh Raikar of Alto Dabolim. Around November 1, 2006, Raikar sent two money orders to his son who was then residing at Dharamshala, Butawal in Nepal. The first money order was for 850 and the second money order was for 2,000. The money orders were sent from Margao post office.
It is Raikar's contention that both the money orders were not delivered to his son in Nepal. In August 2008, he filed a complaint with the South Goa district consumer disputes redressal forum demanding compensation of Rs 8.5 lakh. The forum dismissed the complaint and Raikar then appealed to the state commission.
The Margao post masters' office submitted that the first money order was delivered to Raikar's son in Nepal on January 2, 2007, as informed by the section officer, general post office, Kathmandu, Nepal. The second money order was returned to Raikar on December 3, 2008. The state consumer disputes redressal commission observed that Raikar had not been candid enough to disclose this fact.
Raikar insisted that the first money order must have been delivered to a wrong person on January 2, 2007, because his son had left the address on December 23, 2006.
Counsel for the Margao post master claimed immunity from liability by virtue of Section 48 of the India Post Office Act, 1898. He submitted that the liability of the Indian postal service or for that matter of the central government ceased with the borders of the country and cannot be extended to the acts or omissions on the part of foreign post office.
The counsel also referred to paragraph 84 (2) of the Post Office Guide, which states that the Indian Post Office is exempted by law from all responsibility in the case of wrong payment or delay in payment by foreign postal administration of money orders issued in India.
This is a recent judgment of the Goa state consumer disputes redressal commission which upheld the ruling of the South Goa consumer disputes redressal forum.
The case relates to a complaint filed by Suresh Raikar of Alto Dabolim. Around November 1, 2006, Raikar sent two money orders to his son who was then residing at Dharamshala, Butawal in Nepal. The first money order was for 850 and the second money order was for 2,000. The money orders were sent from Margao post office.
It is Raikar's contention that both the money orders were not delivered to his son in Nepal. In August 2008, he filed a complaint with the South Goa district consumer disputes redressal forum demanding compensation of Rs 8.5 lakh. The forum dismissed the complaint and Raikar then appealed to the state commission.
The Margao post masters' office submitted that the first money order was delivered to Raikar's son in Nepal on January 2, 2007, as informed by the section officer, general post office, Kathmandu, Nepal. The second money order was returned to Raikar on December 3, 2008. The state consumer disputes redressal commission observed that Raikar had not been candid enough to disclose this fact.
Raikar insisted that the first money order must have been delivered to a wrong person on January 2, 2007, because his son had left the address on December 23, 2006.
Counsel for the Margao post master claimed immunity from liability by virtue of Section 48 of the India Post Office Act, 1898. He submitted that the liability of the Indian postal service or for that matter of the central government ceased with the borders of the country and cannot be extended to the acts or omissions on the part of foreign post office.
The counsel also referred to paragraph 84 (2) of the Post Office Guide, which states that the Indian Post Office is exempted by law from all responsibility in the case of wrong payment or delay in payment by foreign postal administration of money orders issued in India.
Times of India
